Synthesis Template

The structured artifact ALX produces at the end of an onboarding journey. The partner copies it from their Claude.ai session and emails it back to the founder.

What it captures

Seven verbatim partner reflections (one per article) plus a synthesized takeaway plus an engagement signal plus any flagged questions. The verbatim answers are gold — they reveal what the partner actually thinks before any negotiation framing kicks in.

Canonical structure

─────────────────────────────────────────
GROWDIRECT ONBOARDING — SYNTHESIS BRIEF
─────────────────────────────────────────

Partner: [name or opaque identifier]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Session: spawned by ALX onboarding prompt v0.1
Hash-chain prev: [NEW or hash of prior artifact]

REACTION TO GROWDIRECT'S FRAMING (Article 1)
[verbatim]

WORKSTREAM CALIBRATION (Article 2)
Right for SMB: [verbatim]
Enterprise overkill: [verbatim]

DIAGNOSTIC FRAME REACTION (Article 3)
Strongest part: [verbatim]
Would push back on: [verbatim]

CBM v2 OPINION (Article 4)
Strongest opinion on: [verbatim]
Their view: [verbatim]

SMB COLLAPSE BULLSHIT DETECTOR (Article 5)
[verbatim]

LAUNCH SHAPE (Article 6)
[verbatim]

EVIDENCE PACK GAPS (Article 7)
Missing: [verbatim]

OVERALL TAKEAWAY (ALX synthesis)
[one paragraph distilling the seven answers]

ENGAGEMENT SIGNAL
[1-5 scale or open-ended]

QUESTIONS FOR GEOFFREY
[any deferred questions]

─────────────────────────────────────────

How the founder uses it

  1. Read once, fully, in the partner's voice. Don't pre-frame. The first read is to hear them.
  2. Cross-reference against the dispatch. Did they engage with what you expected? What surprises?
  3. Tag for memory bus ingestion.
  4. File: Brain/raw/inbox/onboarding/<partner-slug>-synthesis-<date>.md
  5. Frontmatter: partner: <slug>, chain-prev: <prior-hash or NEW>, chain-next: <will be set when next artifact lands>, signal: <1-5>, flags: [...]
  6. Run engine.py registry build to fold into the memory bus.
  7. Compute the SHA-256 hash of the synthesis file content. Record it in Brain/projects/<partner-slug>.md under a chain: section as the latest entry.
  8. Address questions for Geoffrey directly via email or in the next live conversation. Don't let them queue.

The hash chain — what it gives you

For each partner, you accumulate a chain of artifacts:

[NEW] → synthesis-001 → synthesis-002 → debrief-003 → ...

Each entry records: - File path (canonical location) - Content hash (SHA-256) - Previous-entry hash (links the chain) - Date - Source session description

The partner can request a copy of their chain at any time. Comparing their chain to GrowDirect's chain proves nothing was rewritten, inserted, or omitted. This is engagement-grade audit at no extra cost — same hash-chain pattern Canary uses on transactions.

Per-partner project file

Recommended structure for Brain/projects/<partner-slug>.md:

---
type: partner-engagement
partner: <slug>
status: active
classification: confidential
owner: GrowDirect LLC
---

# Partner — <opaque label or name>

## Engagement chain

| Date | Artifact | Hash | Prev | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-XX | dispatch sent | <hash> | NEW | v0.1 prompt |
| 2026-04-XX | synthesis returned | <hash> | <prev> | signal: 4 |
| 2026-05-XX | follow-up debrief | <hash> | <prev> | post-call |
| ... | | | | |

## Memory profile

What this partner cares about, accumulated:
- ...

## Questions for me

- ...

## Open commitments

- ...

Each new interaction with the partner appends to this file and to the chain.